Monday 19 July 2010
On Metaphysics: Existence Defined
On Metaphysics: Existence Defined: "`Metaphysics` deals with the `*being` of the `first cause+`. (Ref:- Book IV Aristotle Metaphysics chapter 1, the last conclusive sentence r..."
Sunday 18 July 2010
Existence Defined
`Metaphysics` deals with the `*being` of the `first cause+`.
(Ref:- Book IV Aristotle Metaphysics chapter 1, the last conclusive sentence reads thus, `Therefore it is of being as being that we also must grasp the first cause.`)
This current view has to be addressed in order to position a subject that cannot be tracked+, and find a verb that has to originate out from a vurgin domain that `*is what it is` since all the attributions involved has to come from its own source.
Thus if `metaphysics` has to be the subject that treats the first cause, than the being + of this object must contain no traces of origins, whilst on te other hand if we have to investigate an *original state of any causation, then this search has to turn round into our foundations so as to find out a being that has to crop up from the symptoms of deductions that would point towards a source that is over and beyond and sorts of resource.
This dual aspect is the *dyad of the caveat+ of existence that could be treated out independently and separately for hints that motivates us in order to conduct this mysterious search that is directed at an original *being that is indispensable for the first cause + and the virtues + that are dispensed out from an unknown *source.
With this preview at the back of our mind a blank slate or a `tabula rasa` attitude has to be instilled into us, in order to find out the ingredients of the symbolic tokens of `*+` and position all of them into an image of `X` that belongs to none of them in order to to initiate a stage of a dead end (cul-de-sac) and then return back and find out who was responsible for all of them.
Whilst it had been Socrates (469 - 399 BC) who had shown us the importace of thinking over and upon an unblemished sheet in a democratic style that has to be detached and isolated away from any `cause and effect`, it had been by the efforts of various other thinkers that we got to know the ligaments of the four classical elements.
The symbolic tokens upon which we had latched the formation of existence for over two thousands years are the classical elements of `earth, air, fire and water`.
Thus we are left with a common denomination over which we could relate `x+` but would eventually disgree about the results that would be hinged upon them, and so we would have to resort towards our foundation and out of which we could gather more energy to propel us to investigate existence over an *axle that is carrying us all towards a common direction that we cannot ever pinpoint.
The fountain out from which this octane (8) fuel has to be searched are secluded behind the four fundamental questions that any kind of a homo sapience tends to asks. These four fundamental questions are, `Who am I? Where am I? Where are we off to? and Where have we come from?` The volatile answers that are always given in the end makes us conscious with the quip that is uttered in all professional fields, which is `*knowing more and more about less and less+`.
We might tend to resort towards reasoning in order to zoom into this issue in order to treat it from the bud, yet even our reasoning would eventually become folly whenever logics are exhausted which makes us resort towards a ploy to construct `*deus ex machina+` and then upon these extracts, other different opinions are bound to branch ot.
Logging upon anything in order to latch over and across the first cause is the objective of metaphysics, which by itself cannot be expressed and that is why it had to be represented out by an `X` since we all have to focus upon a stable source in order to get a *beginning that is the product of something else+.
Any comprehensive investigation about `metaphysics` conducted between `us` could only initiate over a common denomination that has to be discussed ahead of everything else as the Being of the being of the `first cause`. The image of the `X` has so far, presented us with a value (accepted by us) as a default upon which we could explore a horizon that we had never ever crossed before.
This rule of thumb has to be restrained by the capacity of our brains and limited to the abilities of the physical means that we have, in order not to be led astray and get bogged into something else.
These parameters had already been streatched to the full when humanity had accepted the `four classical elements` as the symbolic tokens of this universe.
So whilst Socrates seemed to have laid the foundation for any sort of wisdom to be positioned over a blank slate (tabula rasa), yet it was Empedocles who had managed to break the deadlock of this `incubation aspect` by conducting a `deja vu` ahead of everything and thus laid this `case` to rest for a while.
According to Aristotle (Metaphysics Book 1 chapter 3) all these contents of existence had been triggered by Thales (620 - 540 BC approx) who had stated that everything rests upon `water` and so this token must have been the first one that was actually named. Yet even this view must have been influenced by an Egyptian culture years before that. Then it was Anaximenes of Miletus (585 - 546 BC) who inserted `air` as the platform of everything. Then again there was Hippasus of Metapontum who insisted that `fire` has to be accredited as the ligament of everything. At last it was Empedocles of Agrigento (490 - 430 BC) who had successfully put this quest to rest by naming `earth` at the finite element that has to be mingled with the other ingredients segregated and integrated by means of `love and strife`.
These `elements` had stayed in contention for over 2000 years, until Sir Isaac Newton (1642 - 1727) regulated scientific research upon existing information which was cleverly swtched and turned in a formal way.
This systematic method of conforming experiments with the laws of nature and thus ignoring any involvement from the Being of the being was not accepted to the old school who were still regarding the `classical elements` as a finite form. Newton defended his scientific methods by his enigmatic phrase, `+hypotheses non fingo*` which suggests that a finite state is unknown. In actual fact what newton had managed to do was to conceive a `law of nature` (matter) that was placed in front in order to (i) relate (ii) polarize (iii) invert/convert (time/space) to present a conclusive result out from what had been composed in a regulated formation. All the information that had to be derived were being conducted by the features of imagination that scrutinize and analyse existence out from a single aspect that were altered and changed in scientific terms. This kind of scientific permutation that computes everything upon `cause and effect` is nowadays being regarded as `what comes in - comes out` leaving us to survey the end results.
What Newton had accomplished was that he had generated a `law of nature` by mathematical construction, which none of them had been laid or positioned over a `blank slate`. Empedocles had not been immune to the effect of this dilemma of the `first cause` which at some point has to be applied and copied into an incidental formation, even though his metaphysical inspirations had been derived out from `poetry`. (Aristotle criticize him for lisping and hiding behind obscure words)
The inspiration style of `poetry` employed by Empedocles was instrumental to include `earth` as the fourth dimension needed for this `case` to be closed.
So now we could conclude that by the virtue of poetry Empedocles must have been inspired to write his works of `nature forms +` (matter +) that have led him to discover the classical element of `earth+` that had developed out of `nothing*`.
Another craft that delivers various expressions is `art+` that again has no background from where it originates but yet designs engineering whenever this basic concept is applied towards construction over features of `relativity +` that cannot be grasped - it is just taken for granted akin to the classical element of `air+` that is here but `unseen*`.
`Dreaming+` which is the Carnival of our life, allows us to fathom our conscious and ultra-conscious without enduring disgrace or disarray. This alpha of the night gives us the omega of the day is the `polarity+` factor that had been named as `water+` that initiate a chapter out from `nowhere*`.
Our temperamental formation keep searching for tranquility that is positioned into an intermediate state of a latent mode found in the condition of `meditation+` that is a virtue by which we could transcend out from `time/space+` away from the classical element of `fire+` right into the `emptiness*`.
So by means of this information we could now conclude that all these virtues have ended into a dead end (cul-de-sac) and since they had all been blocked away from us they have got to be regarded as the first cause that cannot go backward anymore. Therefore since their being is beyond `us` we could now search for a `*being` who is above them.
Therefore `inspiration` cannot be applied to impose a `being` that is above this formation of `nothingness`.
This being cannot be portrait in any sort of `craft` because this art is `unseen*`
Dreaming about this being cannot be done by our conscious or ultra-consious since we cannot quantifiy anything out of `nowhere*`.
The manipulative style of meditating is not effective since it has to be employed over `emptiness*`.
Therefore since out from these four venues of the first cause+ a being cannot be indicated out, so this *Being has to be considered to be as the original `*Verb` or as had been acclaimed beforehand, `Verbum Carum Factum Est`.
All this information makes us believe that this *being is non other than `*Yahweh`. This is the only *Being that `is whatever it is`.
The *Being of this chronological `Verb+` could also be synchronized ino a being that was perfect amongst us. It had been Simon who had concluded that Jesus of Nazareth was the `Christ` and in return Simon was hailed Peter (rock - earth).
This darkness that is enshrouded by means of the death that faces us all, had been conquered at the price of a *being that was sacrificed in order to redeem us all.
Easter is this incubation aspect when the curtains of the temple are ripped apart (Gospel of St Matthew 27 : 51) This particular moment is the peak of salvation when the doors of heaven have been opened wide, confirming that the verb of Emanuel is indeed Yahweh.
All these details had come from a `blank slate` that had remained untainted until the end - Our Lady of Sorrows had been the Rose who had all the credentials to conceive `Love*` that is the `being of the first cause` when the `*verb was made flesh+`.
This quest of discovery into the meaning of existence had been followed upon these very same guidelines in the book, Homo Sapience Joseph II` Published Matador ISBN 978-1848762-237.
(Ref:- Book IV Aristotle Metaphysics chapter 1, the last conclusive sentence reads thus, `Therefore it is of being as being that we also must grasp the first cause.`)
This current view has to be addressed in order to position a subject that cannot be tracked+, and find a verb that has to originate out from a vurgin domain that `*is what it is` since all the attributions involved has to come from its own source.
Thus if `metaphysics` has to be the subject that treats the first cause, than the being + of this object must contain no traces of origins, whilst on te other hand if we have to investigate an *original state of any causation, then this search has to turn round into our foundations so as to find out a being that has to crop up from the symptoms of deductions that would point towards a source that is over and beyond and sorts of resource.
This dual aspect is the *dyad of the caveat+ of existence that could be treated out independently and separately for hints that motivates us in order to conduct this mysterious search that is directed at an original *being that is indispensable for the first cause + and the virtues + that are dispensed out from an unknown *source.
With this preview at the back of our mind a blank slate or a `tabula rasa` attitude has to be instilled into us, in order to find out the ingredients of the symbolic tokens of `*+` and position all of them into an image of `X` that belongs to none of them in order to to initiate a stage of a dead end (cul-de-sac) and then return back and find out who was responsible for all of them.
Whilst it had been Socrates (469 - 399 BC) who had shown us the importace of thinking over and upon an unblemished sheet in a democratic style that has to be detached and isolated away from any `cause and effect`, it had been by the efforts of various other thinkers that we got to know the ligaments of the four classical elements.
The symbolic tokens upon which we had latched the formation of existence for over two thousands years are the classical elements of `earth, air, fire and water`.
Thus we are left with a common denomination over which we could relate `x+` but would eventually disgree about the results that would be hinged upon them, and so we would have to resort towards our foundation and out of which we could gather more energy to propel us to investigate existence over an *axle that is carrying us all towards a common direction that we cannot ever pinpoint.
The fountain out from which this octane (8) fuel has to be searched are secluded behind the four fundamental questions that any kind of a homo sapience tends to asks. These four fundamental questions are, `Who am I? Where am I? Where are we off to? and Where have we come from?` The volatile answers that are always given in the end makes us conscious with the quip that is uttered in all professional fields, which is `*knowing more and more about less and less+`.
We might tend to resort towards reasoning in order to zoom into this issue in order to treat it from the bud, yet even our reasoning would eventually become folly whenever logics are exhausted which makes us resort towards a ploy to construct `*deus ex machina+` and then upon these extracts, other different opinions are bound to branch ot.
Logging upon anything in order to latch over and across the first cause is the objective of metaphysics, which by itself cannot be expressed and that is why it had to be represented out by an `X` since we all have to focus upon a stable source in order to get a *beginning that is the product of something else+.
Any comprehensive investigation about `metaphysics` conducted between `us` could only initiate over a common denomination that has to be discussed ahead of everything else as the Being of the being of the `first cause`. The image of the `X` has so far, presented us with a value (accepted by us) as a default upon which we could explore a horizon that we had never ever crossed before.
This rule of thumb has to be restrained by the capacity of our brains and limited to the abilities of the physical means that we have, in order not to be led astray and get bogged into something else.
These parameters had already been streatched to the full when humanity had accepted the `four classical elements` as the symbolic tokens of this universe.
So whilst Socrates seemed to have laid the foundation for any sort of wisdom to be positioned over a blank slate (tabula rasa), yet it was Empedocles who had managed to break the deadlock of this `incubation aspect` by conducting a `deja vu` ahead of everything and thus laid this `case` to rest for a while.
According to Aristotle (Metaphysics Book 1 chapter 3) all these contents of existence had been triggered by Thales (620 - 540 BC approx) who had stated that everything rests upon `water` and so this token must have been the first one that was actually named. Yet even this view must have been influenced by an Egyptian culture years before that. Then it was Anaximenes of Miletus (585 - 546 BC) who inserted `air` as the platform of everything. Then again there was Hippasus of Metapontum who insisted that `fire` has to be accredited as the ligament of everything. At last it was Empedocles of Agrigento (490 - 430 BC) who had successfully put this quest to rest by naming `earth` at the finite element that has to be mingled with the other ingredients segregated and integrated by means of `love and strife`.
These `elements` had stayed in contention for over 2000 years, until Sir Isaac Newton (1642 - 1727) regulated scientific research upon existing information which was cleverly swtched and turned in a formal way.
This systematic method of conforming experiments with the laws of nature and thus ignoring any involvement from the Being of the being was not accepted to the old school who were still regarding the `classical elements` as a finite form. Newton defended his scientific methods by his enigmatic phrase, `+hypotheses non fingo*` which suggests that a finite state is unknown. In actual fact what newton had managed to do was to conceive a `law of nature` (matter) that was placed in front in order to (i) relate (ii) polarize (iii) invert/convert (time/space) to present a conclusive result out from what had been composed in a regulated formation. All the information that had to be derived were being conducted by the features of imagination that scrutinize and analyse existence out from a single aspect that were altered and changed in scientific terms. This kind of scientific permutation that computes everything upon `cause and effect` is nowadays being regarded as `what comes in - comes out` leaving us to survey the end results.
What Newton had accomplished was that he had generated a `law of nature` by mathematical construction, which none of them had been laid or positioned over a `blank slate`. Empedocles had not been immune to the effect of this dilemma of the `first cause` which at some point has to be applied and copied into an incidental formation, even though his metaphysical inspirations had been derived out from `poetry`. (Aristotle criticize him for lisping and hiding behind obscure words)
The inspiration style of `poetry` employed by Empedocles was instrumental to include `earth` as the fourth dimension needed for this `case` to be closed.
So now we could conclude that by the virtue of poetry Empedocles must have been inspired to write his works of `nature forms +` (matter +) that have led him to discover the classical element of `earth+` that had developed out of `nothing*`.
Another craft that delivers various expressions is `art+` that again has no background from where it originates but yet designs engineering whenever this basic concept is applied towards construction over features of `relativity +` that cannot be grasped - it is just taken for granted akin to the classical element of `air+` that is here but `unseen*`.
`Dreaming+` which is the Carnival of our life, allows us to fathom our conscious and ultra-conscious without enduring disgrace or disarray. This alpha of the night gives us the omega of the day is the `polarity+` factor that had been named as `water+` that initiate a chapter out from `nowhere*`.
Our temperamental formation keep searching for tranquility that is positioned into an intermediate state of a latent mode found in the condition of `meditation+` that is a virtue by which we could transcend out from `time/space+` away from the classical element of `fire+` right into the `emptiness*`.
So by means of this information we could now conclude that all these virtues have ended into a dead end (cul-de-sac) and since they had all been blocked away from us they have got to be regarded as the first cause that cannot go backward anymore. Therefore since their being is beyond `us` we could now search for a `*being` who is above them.
Therefore `inspiration` cannot be applied to impose a `being` that is above this formation of `nothingness`.
This being cannot be portrait in any sort of `craft` because this art is `unseen*`
Dreaming about this being cannot be done by our conscious or ultra-consious since we cannot quantifiy anything out of `nowhere*`.
The manipulative style of meditating is not effective since it has to be employed over `emptiness*`.
Therefore since out from these four venues of the first cause+ a being cannot be indicated out, so this *Being has to be considered to be as the original `*Verb` or as had been acclaimed beforehand, `Verbum Carum Factum Est`.
All this information makes us believe that this *being is non other than `*Yahweh`. This is the only *Being that `is whatever it is`.
The *Being of this chronological `Verb+` could also be synchronized ino a being that was perfect amongst us. It had been Simon who had concluded that Jesus of Nazareth was the `Christ` and in return Simon was hailed Peter (rock - earth).
This darkness that is enshrouded by means of the death that faces us all, had been conquered at the price of a *being that was sacrificed in order to redeem us all.
Easter is this incubation aspect when the curtains of the temple are ripped apart (Gospel of St Matthew 27 : 51) This particular moment is the peak of salvation when the doors of heaven have been opened wide, confirming that the verb of Emanuel is indeed Yahweh.
All these details had come from a `blank slate` that had remained untainted until the end - Our Lady of Sorrows had been the Rose who had all the credentials to conceive `Love*` that is the `being of the first cause` when the `*verb was made flesh+`.
This quest of discovery into the meaning of existence had been followed upon these very same guidelines in the book, Homo Sapience Joseph II` Published Matador ISBN 978-1848762-237.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)